American Higher Education in Global World

Jinhyun Kim

According to the article, “New Era in International Higher Education” by Scott Jaschik, many American colleges are reaching further in providing education outside the United States by opening campuses in foreign countries. By this expansion, many students outside the United States get opportunities to earn degrees from American colleges without going through all the big change of moving into the United States which often times involves very complicated and tough process.

Nowadays, American higher education already involves diversity in several ways. Colleges form big communities and play significant role in global world. Also, total enrollment of foreign students in American colleges is large. Colleges consist of students from all over the world and benefit from them in making better communities within their campuses.

Furthermore, American colleges are now opening campuses in foreign countries. I think this step that colleges are taking is very beneficial for both colleges and students who experience this American higher education’s extension. Colleges will have different aspects from students which can help in variety of researches. Students are able to earn degrees from American college which would be really helpful in becoming a global leader or worker, and students do not have to deal with moving to another country and difficult process of obtaining visa or immigration issues. In addition, students in American colleges can experience different culture in those American colleges in foreign country as colleges often encourage students to study abroad.

For example, Georgia Institute of Technology offers a solid program of study abroad. As well as many foreign colleges are having joint program with Georgia Tech, the school has its own campus, Georgia Tech-Lorraine in Metz, France. Students have good opportunities to live in different culture, take classes like the ones in Georgia Tech main campus, and earn degrees from Georgia Tech.

Today’s society is not about concentration on one field. A lot of fields and works prefer people who are well-around and people who will become a global leader. I think both foreign students involvement in American colleges and American colleges’ expansion in foreign countries are great ways for students to become the people who the global world wants.

Lecture Capture and Attendance: Are students really less likely to attend class?

Cherish Weiler

As technology becomes more and more integrated in higher education, a new technology known as ‘lecture capture’ has emerged with its fair share of fans and critics. Lecture capture is a system that allows professors to record their lectures and post them online and has recently been the issue of some controversy as the software becomes more developed and studies analyzing its efficacy become available. While skeptics argue that the use of such technology would lead to decreased attendance in class, panelists at the 2009 Educause Conference cited research suggesting there is no correlation between a professor’s decision to post lectures online and a student’s likelihood to attend class.

According to Jennifer Stinger, director of educational technology at Stanford University School of medicine, students base their decision to attend lectures on the quality of the lecture and the professor’s engagement during lectures. In a study conducted in 2008, 78 percent of undergraduates at the University of Wisconsin at Madison reported that having lectures available online would help them better retain class material and 76 percent believed online lectures would help improve their test scores. While students appear to support lecture capture, professors are less receptive to incorporating such technology in their classrooms. At Purdue University, David Eisert, manager of emerging technologies, reported that faculty members would not be willing to initiate lecture capture at the start of class were it available. Regardless, Purdue University plans on implementing the software in over 280 classrooms and working towards a compromise that would entail minimal cooperation from reluctant professors.

While professors may be wary about incorporating lecture capture in their classroom, it is to the benefit of their students that they do so. With research denying the claim that lecture capture promotes absenteeism, what harm is there in using such technology, especially when student opinion suggest lecture capture has the potential to help many students and their grades? If schools are willing to purchase lecture capture technology, there is no reason why faculty cannot participate. Lecture capture technology is already popular among students and will only increase in popularity as universities begin implementing its use in the classroom.

Cars, Cars, Cars

Cessie Ryder

College is a time where you learn to be independent and accomplish things on your own without the relying on your parents or other comforts and luxuries you were used to at home. One thing I have come to find has been particularly difficult is the absence of a having a car. In high school many people tend to take their car for granted and when they get to college they realize how good they had it when they had a car at their beck and call.

Seemingly small things like going to the grocery store and running to bank are not so easy without a car, especially in a city that is built around the car as the main form of transportation. To run a simple errand you have to choose a day when you can block off a certain amount of time and you have to plan in advance how you are going to get there. Not having a car also restricts college students to staying on or near campus so they cannot go out and experience the city or town where their college is located. Experiencing different things in a new city is important to feel part of the community and to build character.

Even though not having a car may seem like a hassle, it is not all bad. One good thing about using different forms of transportation is the effect on the environment. If less people use cars then there will be less pollution to the environment. Not only does it help the environment but no possessing a car also forces you to be creative and find different ways to get around instead of relying on what you are comfortable and used to.

Does Name Matter?

Ajit Vakharia

Harvard, Yale, and Princeton are some of the nation’s most prestigious universities, but does going to a college such as these give students a better chance at being successful after their collegiate career compared to a student from any other university? According to Marilee Jones an admissions director at MIT, college name does not matter for future endeavors. A graduate of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Jones says, “You can succeed by going to any school,” but she fails to show instances where students from non ivy league schools have done better than students from ivy league schools. The average starting salary for a Princeton University graduate is 65,000 dollars while the average starting salary for a Georgia Tech graduate is 58,900 dollars which is a substantial difference. Though many people will deny that going to a better school will give you better success after graduation, the truth is that the better the name, the more money graduates are making out of the school.

Students go to college to get the training they need to become successful members of the working field, and colleges with better names get them better careers. Does this mean all students that do not go to ivy league schools will have bad jobs? No. These are only statistics which can be broken. A graduate from a community college in North Dakota could go on the make millions of dollars a year from their career. As Jones brings up, “College is what a student makes it.” A graduate from Georgia Tech can have a 3.8 GPA with a lot of extracurriculars would more likely than not be picked over a Harvard graduate with 3.2 GPA and no extracurriculars applying for the same job. So name does matter, but does not mean students from not as popular schools cannot go on to be just as successful as a graduate from an ivy league.

Gaming in college

Subin Lee


Gaming in college

College for most students is a place to enhance their education. However, for some, college is a place for sports, partying or recreation. One of the biggest recreations that the majority of the students participate is online games. Colleges are the places where they host LAN parties, which is a gathering of hard core gamers. All sorts of games are played by college students, including first-person-shooting games, role playing games, simulation games, and even gambling. Colleges have one of the fastest internet connections in the nation. This therefore allows players to play in a faster cyber world environment.
The problem with online games is the issue of addiction. Games are just as addicting as cigarettes. Not just in the game play but also meeting people online. For example in RPG games, players meet new people, and make a party in order play through the game together. Sometimes, they even make schedules when to log in and play together. Major game addicts may play up to or even more than 15 hours a day.
Online games consume a significant amount of time. This can affect student’s health, daily life pattern, grades, and social life. Long hours on the computer or video games can kill brain cells, deprive student’s sleep, and mess up eating schedule. Due to laziness, gamers might skip meals just to play more, and sleep at late odd hours.
Game can then lead students to miss classes due to daily improper schedule and increasing addiction. For online gamblers, it can also improve the speed of wasting a lot of money. Counseling services have been added to assist the estimated 11 percent of students who have a problem with these addictions whether it be card games with friends, online gambling or visiting casinos.
The harsh fact is that all college students own a computer, and most own a laptop. Laptop meaning portable, which means students can bring their laptops anywhere including their classes. This means that students can even play games on their laptops anywhere including their classes.

Budget Reduction: Should it Result in Quality Reduction?

Jinhyun Kim

The article “Insult to Injury” describes that “midyear [budget] reductions have been a national phenomenon over the past few months”, among colleges in the United States. This sudden budget reduction affecting a lot of colleges, which were apparently not prepare for this problem, has become a big issue recently to many of people such as college students, teachers, and faculties.

Colleges or universities, bigger or smaller, form own communities within which include various things from academics to profession to recreation. Colleges and people of the community usually greatly benefit from these as well as academics. However, if colleges cannot figure out how to solve this low budget issue, all the exciting things beside academics of colleges will be short of fund, and they will lose a great factor of their community.

Also as showed in the article “Insult to Injury”, school cannot afford all the teachers as full time employees. Some schools had to let go of some teachers or faculties. Some schools had to shift toward employing more part-time teachers. In addition, fewer classes offered and larger class size would likely occur, and people became to worry about the change in quality of education that students are getting in higher education according to the article, “Are State Budget Cuts Affecting the Quality of Public Higher Education?”

I think the ones who will be affected by the budget reductions the most and the longest are the college students as well as prospective students within a few years. There can be an increase in tuition from the school for the new students to enroll in the college. Besides, it will be harder for schools to provide the same financial aid to students. It could be a lot of pressure for some students over the nation to choose or go to school that they want. Students go to a college not only to study their major but also to experience a lot of activities and opportunities that they like other than classes. Students would not be very happy if they cannot continue having some fun in extracurricular activities aside the hard works from classes.

The issue of budget reductions in colleges is giving a big problem not only for school faculties but all the people belong to the community. I hope the college communities, together as one, can discuss and use this chance as a time to invest and find the ways of reducing wasteful cost and saving money for the greater good for everyone.

The Disadvantage of Minimal Foreign Language Requirements

Cherish Weiler

A recent study conducted by the American Council on Education found that fewer than one in five universities in the U.S. require a foreign-language credit from their undergraduates. While the study of languages is a well-known scholastic practice of the past, perhaps even a central component of education at one point in time, critics question the application of such minimal requirements in today’s society.

Dan Edelstein argues that mere tradition is not enough to keep colleges from requiring a foreign language credit or two. He points to evidence showing a decreased enrollment among undergraduates in foreign language courses and to evidence showing universities reducing their availability of language courses due to decreased funding. Edelstein suggests that the future of foreign language requirements depend on the ability of students to advance far in a particular language. He argues that the minimal requirements are hardly beneficial to students; in order to adequately learn a language and become proficient, students need to total immersion, not a year of introductory once-a-week classes. Edelstein recognizes the good intentions of universities that require language courses from their undergraduates but states that these “token requirements” are not enough to satisfy those intentions and goals.

Edelstein makes a bold argument against the need for minimal language requirements for college undergraduates. I agree that the need for cultural enrichment and the importance of multilingual skills are high in modern society and that the universities do have good intentions when requiring such language courses. However, I also agree that the level of requirement is not enough to truly benefit a student. Instead, I support the idea of removing required language courses but offering more beneficial and accessible programs such as a “total immersion” program or more accessible study abroad programs. Students should be able to decide the extent of their foreign language study and not be required to take classes that are of no value or use to them in the long run.